> MILLI MEP | Accountable MEP Design & Technical Coordination

MEP design consultancy · Tbilisi

Accountable MEP design for buildings that need to perform.

Our engineers help developers, architects and delivery teams control technical risk through coordinated building-services design, rigorous technical governance and clear responsibility.

Engineer-led Performance-based Internationally informed
Milli MEP engineering decision model — project inputs, controlled outputs and stage-gate design basis.

Engineering decision model · Select to view at full resolution

11+years of engineering experience
4regions of project experience
MCIBSEprofessional membership
Engineer-ledclear technical accountability

The commercial problem

MEP risk becomes expensive when it is found late.

We connect engineering decisions to cost, space, programme, compliance and operation from the first design conversation.

01

Plant and infrastructure

Utility capacity, plant space and distribution routes are tested before late design decisions make them expensive.

02

Coordination and buildability

Risers, ceiling zones, louvres, access and structural interfaces are resolved as part of the engineering strategy.

03

Life safety and compliance

Regulatory duties, fire-engineering interfaces and system responsibilities are defined before information is issued.

04

Performance and operation

Loads, controls, maintainability and commissioning requirements are carried through from design intent to handover.

Core services

Engineering scope built around project outcomes.

Each appointment starts with a defined brief, responsibility boundary, information schedule and review route.

MEP–01

MEP Design

Comprehensive mechanical, electrical and public-health design with an explicit Basis of Design, coordinated information flow and accountable technical oversight.

Design brief and Basis of Design report · System schematics and coordinated layouts · Equipment and plant schedules · Technical specifications
MEP–02

Mechanical and HVAC

Heating, cooling, ventilation and plant design developed from verified loads, operating profiles, energy criteria and spatial constraints.

Load calculations and ventilation schedules · Psychrometric analysis · Plant and equipment selections · Schematics and layouts
MEP–03

Public Health Engineering

Domestic water, drainage, plumbing and utility systems designed around demand, pressure, hygiene, resilience and maintainable distribution.

Demand calculations · Storage and booster sizing · Domestic hot-water calculations · Pipework schematics and layouts
MEP–04

Fire Protection Coordination

Defined design and coordination support for firefighting systems, smoke control and building-services life-safety interfaces.

Scope and responsibility matrix · Performance criteria and design calculations · System schematics and layouts · Cause-and-effect input
MEP–05

Technical Reviews and Design Audits

Independent review of design assumptions, calculations, drawings, specifications, compliance and buildability before project commitment.

Independent review report · Risk-ranked observations · Calculation spot checks · Design-compliance matrix
MEP–06

Calculations and Analysis

Load calculations, system sizing, pressure-loss checks and performance analysis linked to stated inputs and design decisions.

Input and assumption register · Calculation sheets and model outputs · Sensitivity and diversity checks · Duty and selection schedules
MEP–07

Feasibility Studies

Early technical assessment of utilities, plant space, system options, compliance constraints and delivery risks before major commitments are made.

Feasibility report · Option and risk matrix · Preliminary loads and demands · Plant and riser allowance schedule
MEP–08

Contractor and Site Support

Technical clarifications, shop-drawing review and construction-phase support tied to an established design intent and recorded acceptance criteria.

Technical review comments · RFI responses and decision records · Submittal registers · Site observation records

Need an independent review rather than a full design appointment?

Define the review scope

Sector focus

Sector knowledge changes the engineering brief.

We prioritise building types where operational requirements, life-safety interfaces and spatial decisions materially shape the design.

01

Commercial and workplace

Flexible occupation demands systems that remain efficient, controllable and maintainable beyond the first tenant layout.

02

Residential and mixed-use

High-density buildings turn small assumptions into repeated cost, space and operational consequences.

03

Hospitality and leisure

The engineering must protect the guest experience while supporting intensive back-of-house operation.

04

Industrial and manufacturing

Process conditions, contamination routes and production continuity govern the building-services strategy.

05

Mission-critical environments

Continuity, maintainability and failure response must be designed into the system from the outset.

Review the engineering priorities for each building type.

View sectors

Selected experience

Complex projects. Clearly defined engineering scope.

The projects below reflect experience across hospitality, industrial, residential and mixed-use environments. Each example focuses on the technical challenge, the engineering response and the principal project constraints.

Luxury hospitality and events venue — HVAC, ventilation and multidisciplinary coordination
Illustrative image

Hospitality and events · Georgia

Luxury hospitality and events venue

The engineering approach aligned room loads, ventilation demand, air distribution, plant capacity and coordination requirements before equipment selection was finalised.

Beverage production facility — process HVAC and utilities
Illustrative image

Industrial food and beverage · Georgia

Beverage production facility

Comfort, process and safety requirements were assessed separately so that ventilation, utilities and plant decisions responded to actual production conditions - not floor area alone.

Major residential development — MEP, fire and authority coordination
Illustrative image

Residential · Georgia

Major residential development

The design-management approach established consistent criteria, clear zone boundaries and coordinated vertical distribution across architecture, structure and life-safety systems.

High-rise mixed-use tower — central plant, pressure zoning and MEP coordination
Illustrative image

High-rise mixed-use · Georgia

High-rise mixed-use development

Static pressure, pressure zoning, central-plant capacity and distribution routes were resolved as connected engineering decisions rather than isolated discipline calculations.

Experience note: These examples reflect professional experience gained through previous employment and consultancy engagements. This experience now informs MILLI MEP’s technical approach, design coordination and project delivery.

Delivery process

A visible route from brief to verified information.

01

Define

Establish project goals, technical requirements, performance criteria, responsibility and constraints.

02

Design

Develop the design basis, system strategy, calculations and coordinated engineering solutions.

03

Coordinate

Resolve architectural, structural, fire-strategy and building-services interfaces.

04

Review and Verify

Check calculations, drawings, schedules and specifications for accuracy, compliance and constructability.

05

Deliver and Support

Issue controlled documentation and provide support through construction, commissioning and handover.

Technical governance

Standards inform the design. Performance proves it.

The applicable statutory requirements, client criteria and recognised engineering guidance are established within the Basis of Design. Conflicts and departures are recorded, not hidden.

Georgian regulationsCIBSEBS / BS ENBSRIAASHRAENFPA where applicable
Review technical governance

Issue control / MM-QA-01

  • 01 Responsibility and scope confirmed
  • 02 Criteria and assumptions recorded
  • 03 Calculations linked to selected systems
  • 04 Interfaces reviewed across disciplines
  • 05 Documents checked before issue
  • 06 Changes controlled through revision

Project enquiry

Bring the project constraints. We will define the engineering route.

Send the location, building type, approximate area, current stage, required services and target deliverable date. We will use that information to test appointment fit and the next technical step.

Use the project enquiry form info@millimep.com 511 17 55 66

Milli MEP engineering decision model

Milli MEP engineering decision model — project inputs, controlled outputs and stage-gate design basis.

Privacy controls